Figure 1 : Vegetable farms at Lojing Highlands (see The Star) |
Where is Lojing?
In the Southeastern part of Kelantan, at the foot of
the Central Titiwangsa Range, Lojing Highllands are the continuation of Cameron
Highlands laying 12km up north. Located
over 1,000 m above sea level, Lojing’s climate is very similar to Cameron’s one.
Lojing is more
than twice bigger than Cameron with an area of 1,817 km2 and a very scarce
population: 5,613 in 2010 on which mostly 4,113 Orang Asli . So the Lojing’s human density is around 3/Km2,
much smaller than Cameron Highlands’ density 52/km2.
While
Pahang is purely a BN/UMNO stronghold, Kelantan has been PKR/PAS ruled during
two long periods: 1959-1977 (18 years) and more recently 1990-2013 (23 years)
until the coming up to the 13th General Election, with a gap period
1978-1990 (12 years) of BN/UMNO’s ruling.
Nik
Abdul Aziz Nik Mat PAS President won a seat in the Kelantan State
Assembly in the 1986 general elections. In 1990, PAS managed to
wrest control of Kelantan back from BN/UMNO, Nik Aziz became Menteri
Besar (MB) of Kelantan. After 23 years in the office, Nik Aziz, 82 years old,
is certainly one of the longest serving MB in the country.
Lojing Highlands was opened up under the South Kelantan
Development Authority (KESEDAR) in 1978. The area was first logged out with its
usual amount of controversy involving the ruling BN/UMNO government (see "Syeds outside the box").
After
1990, big swathes of land were given away to PAS state government linked
companies as well as friendly parties (see Figure 1 above).Vast tracts of
pristine highlands forests at elevations ranging from 500m – 1500m were being
cleared to make way for agriculture.
Forest & Land regulations: many loopholes to flout the rules and no enforcement
Financial provisions in Malaysia are heavily in favor
of the Federal Government. State
Governments are afforded a very limited revenue base, but Forestry under National
Forest Policy Act is a state matter: State Governments have complete
jurisdiction over their respective forest, land and water resources.
As
a result revenue from land and forests is the main solutions at hand for
State Government badly needing money such as Kelantan, and there
will be a significant potential loss of revenue for the State when any area of
the Permanent Forest Estate (PRE) is gazetted as
Protective Forest as explained hereafter.
The
PFE following the National Forestry Act should be demarcated and managed under
four major functions: (a) Permanent Reserved Forest (PRF) for climatic or water
resources ; (b) State land forest for production
of timber; (c) National Parks and (d) Wildlife
and bird sanctuary.
But
forests
in the Highlands are almost invariably not demarcated on the ground, not
afforded legal protection through gazettement other than Permanent Reserve
Forest (PRF).
Permanent
Forest Reserves might be classified as Rank 2 Environmentally Sensitive Areas
(ESA) where only sustainable logging (no conversion to agriculture or
plantations) is allowed, but this could be easily flouted by the state.
Kelantan
has untill now failed to gazette as “Protection Forest” (and continues to cut
down) many areas within its PRF that have conservation importance such as water
catchments, as spelt out in the National Forest Policy.
National
Forestry Council is issuing “key policies” that should be implemented
nationally. As an example of such advices: no logging should be carried out in
forests at an elevation of 1,000m above sea level and above. But will no
obligation for the state to obey as we can see later.
Enforcement is difficult due to poor resources. In the
Department of Wildlife and National Park (PERHILITAN), one officer only was assigned
by 2002 to Cameron’s Montane areas on a permanent basis (see WWF report onPeninsular Malaysia Highlands 2002).
Furthermore
Cameron- Lojing- Kinta Highlands Special Management Area (484 km2) had been
proposed (see ibid.) encompassing most of the settlement within Cameron
Highlands, Lojing in Kelantan, and Kinta Highlands in Perak.
Existing
forest in the SMA in 2002 were constituting 40.3% of the area; steep lands with
slope > 25° constitute 25.2% of the area. No land important either due to
biodiversity or due to landslide or erosion hazard should be alienated for
development purposes.
The Developer
doing application for State land should be required to submit all the necessary
Environment Impact Assessments (EIA) as deemed necessary before an approval is
given.
But
as explained in my post dated 5 April: EIAs approved in Lojing and Gua Musang
over the years, being of dubious quality should not have been approved in the
first place. Developers had carried out projects without submitting
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports while most are just failed to
follow its mitigation plans.
Is PAS Kelantan alienating or granting lands rights in Lojing to gain political leverage?
Until today only Kelantan born people are allowed to own land in Kelantan. This difference from all other states in Malaysia is certainely one of the reasons for Kelantan poor economic results.
Some party have asked Nik Aziz to disclose land deals that his PAS-led Kelantan government had done with a company that has been alleged to have shares owned by some PKR/DAP members in Perak closely associated with PAS in PKR Coalition (see "Lim Kit Siang blog") .
Some party have asked Nik Aziz to disclose land deals that his PAS-led Kelantan government had done with a company that has been alleged to have shares owned by some PKR/DAP members in Perak closely associated with PAS in PKR Coalition (see "Lim Kit Siang blog") .
The land deals were alleged to involve around 4,000ha of a Malay reserved land located
in the Lojing Highlands.
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is investigating the Kelantan
government's joint-venture rubber and oil palm estate project with the company
in which these PKR/DAP members in Perak
- including the DAP Chairman- were
accused to have stakes.
A
source said investigations are looking into ascertaining on whether there were
elements of irregularities or inducement in the deal.
Perak DAP chairman had insisted that his stake in a massive Kelantan land project was
not a “reward” for accepting to turn down the MB’s post after the 2008 general
election for a PKR/PAS Muslim member.
Kelantan is trying to duplicate but unsuccessfully Cameron Highlands
As seen in our post dated 5th of April, the
vegetable farmers from nearby Cameron Highlands due to the end of new TOL allowances
and farmed area restrained to 3,300 ha might have helped trigger the
quest for land in the Lojing Highlands and through ‘joint ventures’ (see SustainableAgriculture in the Cameron Highlands BARROW, C.J.1 and al. 2009).
Due
to weaker enforcement of clearance restrictions in Lojing Highlands, over
25,000 ha have been cleared since 1990, much by those who hold land in the
Cameron Highlands (see ibid.).
The Kelantan government thought that they could easily
replicate Cameron Highlands’ agribusiness success.
Cameron had a total 3,300 ha in farming land and they
believed that if the government could set in production 10 times more area, so
there would be proportionally 10 times more economic benefits.
They forgot something very important. The farmers in
Cameron Highlands – mostly Chinese and Indian families- have had 50 years of
farming experience in the highlands. They are individual farmers practicing
intensive farming and in small farm, averaging 1- 3 hectares.
No sane person being
compulsory Kelantan born citizen could open up thousands of hectares in the
highlands to do intensive farming as the one practiced in Cameron (see "Planet of the Monyets").
Sadly
in the Lojing Highlands, because there are clear uncontaminated land and clean
water supplies, Organic produces could have proved to be a good business model
with an expanding domestic and export market. Unfortunately, clearances in the
Lojing Highlands and through Orang Asli ‘joint-ventures’ jeopardize such hopes.
The sheer scale of the forest destruction in Kelantan is awesome
There are many reasons why ecological
activists are picking on Kelantan as a bad example (Rubber Forest).
The
sheer scale of the
destruction is the first reason. No other state in Peninsular Malaysia can match
Kelantan for scale of deforestation, especially in recent years.
The rate of
deforestation in Kelantan is likely to be around 4% per year, four times higher
than the average deforestation rate for Malaysia (around 1%per year for the
period between 2000 and 2010). Here’s what we know for sure:
Based on the Kelantan
Forestry Department’s (see Figure 2), as of 2011, 199,000ha of the total
623,000ha (32%) of Permanent Reserved Forests (PRF) in Kelantan were zoned for
Latex Timber Clone (LTC) plantations.
This is 1,990 km2 which almost three times the size of Singapore!
While already quite
substantial, the 199,000ha doesn’t include forests that are being converted to
oil palm plantations. Based on EIA reports, another 26,581ha of the state’s
PRFs were approved for conversion to oil palm plantations by 2008-2010 .
And that still
doesn’t include the enormous area that is being cleared for farms in the Lojing
highlands, where 25,436ha (almost 80 percent of the Lojing highlands) has been
earmarked for development.
Figure 2: Plantation zones in Kelantan (see Rubber Forest). |
No comments:
Post a Comment