Thermal stress can cause coral reefs to bleach from losing their symbiotic algae giving them colour (from imgarcade)
Coral reefs are not only a critical habitat for numerous species, they provide also essential ecosystem services such as:
Despite
their importance, coral reefs face unprecedented threats throughout most of
their range and many reefs are already degraded and unable to provide the vital
services on which so many people depend.
Some
threats are highly visible and occur directly on reefs. Levels of fishing are
currently unsustainable on a large proportion of the world’s reefs, and have
led to localized extinctions of certain fish species.
Many threats are also the result of human activities occuring far away from reefs, such
as forest clearing, crop cultivation, intensive farming, polluted sewage
runoff and poorly planned coastal development. Pollution and waste from ships
and from oil and gas exploitation further exacerbate the situation.
Furthermore beyond these extensive and damaging local-scale impacts, reefs are increasingly
at risk from the global threats associated with rising concentrations of
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Even in areas where local stress on reefs
are relatively minimal, warming seas have caused mass coral bleaching occurring when corals become thermally stressed and are
massively losing the “zooxanthellae” symbiotic algae that live within their tissues and
normally provide their specific colors.
It is
rare for any reef to suffer only a single threat. More often the threats are
compounded. For instance, overfishing eliminates a key herbivore such as
“Parrot fish”, while runoff from agriculture supplies nutrients that cause a
bloom in macro algae, impairing the growth of coral
and ultimately reducing the competitive ability of coral communities.
Despite
widespread recognition that reefs are severely threatened, information
regarding threat assessment to specific reefs are limited. Only a fraction of
reefs have been studied or monitored consistently over time- such
as Jamaica, Florida, and Australia’s Great Barrier- where changes in coral
condition are well-documented.
In most places, however, the availability of
detailed information is limited, inhibiting effective management.
More
than 15 years after the foundation of the World Reef Initiative (WRI), reef maps are showing clearly that the growth in threats has
largely outpaced efforts to address those threats.
In the
mid-1990s, climate change was still perceived as a somewhat distant threat.
However, in 1998, a powerful El NiƱo event further increased sea surface
temperatures that were already rising due to climate change, triggering the
most severe and expansive coral bleaching event on record.
As a
result an update of the global coral reef threats analysis is clearly necessary
in order to identify and understand the outcome and implications of changes to the world’s
reefs and to help guide targeted interventions aimed at mitigating existing
threats .
Ranking of worldwide human threats to coral reefs
(see “WRI-Coral Reefs at risk revisited-2011”)
There is a difference between
threats and damages. A threat analysis is an assessment of the likeliness (within
0-100%) of a specified type of damage. A
threat model measures
threat rather than real conditions.
Concerning coral reefs, harmful damage might result from the following threats:
|
Figure 1 : Worldwide human local threats to coral reefs (WRI 2011) |
Overfishing and destructive fishing
Threats to coral reefs from overfishing
were evaluated based on coastal population density and extent of fishing areas, with adjustments to account for the increased
demand due to proximity to large populations and
market centers.
Areas where destructive fishing occurs
(with explosives or poisons such as cyanide)
were also included, based on observations from monitoring and mapping expert analysis.
The threat estimate was reduced inside
marine protected areas rated by experts as having “effective” or “partially
effective” management (meaning that a
level of management is present that helps to guard ecological integrity).
Limitations:
- Accurate, spatially referenced global data on fishing methods, catches, and number of fishers were not available; therefore, population pressure is used as a proxy for overfishing.
- The model fails to capture the targeting of very high value species, which affects most reefs globally, but has fewer ecosystem impacts than wider scale overfishing.
- Management effectiveness scores were only available for about 83% of the reefs within marine protected areas.
Watershed land-based pollution
The threat from land-based pollutants was
modeled over 300,000 watersheds
(catchments area drained by a river and its tributaries) discharging to coastal
waters. Relative erosion rates were estimated
across the landscape based on slope, land cover type, precipitation, and soil
type.
Sediment delivery at the river mouth was
estimated based on total erosion in the watershed,
adjusted for the sediment delivery ratio (based on watershed size) and sediment trapping by dams and
mangroves.
Sediment plume dispersion was modeled
using a linear decay rate and was calibrated against actual sediment plumes
observed from satellite data.
The model represents a proxy for sediment, nutrient, and pollutant delivery.
Limitations:
- Nutrient deliveries to coastal waters were probably underestimated due to a lack of spatial data on crop cultivation and fertilizer application. However, agricultural land is treated as a separate category of land cover, weighted for a higher influence.
- The model does not incorporate nutrient and pollutant inputs from industry, or from intensive livestock farming, which might be considerable.
Coastal development
The threat to coral reefs from coastal
development was modeled based on size of cities, ports, and airports; size and
density of hotels; and coastal population pressure (a combination of population
density, growth, and tourism growth).
Limitations:
- Indicators were likely to miss some new constructions works and tourism locations.
- The model does not directly capture sewage discharge, but relies on population as a proxy for costal development threat.
Figure 2 : Comparison of local and past thermal threats by region (WRI 2011) |
Marine-based pollution and damage
Threat from marine-based
pollution and damage were based on the size and
volume of commercial shipping ports, size and volume of cruise ship ports, intensity of shipping traffic,
and the location of oil infrastructure.
Limitations:
- Threat associated with shipping intensity might be underestimated because the data were based on voluntary ship tracking, and does not include fishing vessels.
- The threat model does not account for marine waste (such as plastics), discarded fishing gear, recreational vessels or shipwrecks, due to a lack of global spatial data on these threats.
- The four local threats described above were then combined to provide an integrated local threat index. Past thermal stress as described below were treated as an additional threat.
Reef regions ranking for marine-based pollution and damage (see Figure 2 above): most threatened are Atlantic (N°1) & Middle East (N°2); less threatened are Indian (N°5) and Southeast Asia (N°6).
Thermal stress
Estimation of thermal stress over the past
10 years (1998 to 2007) combining the following two data layers:
Past intense heating events. These were
areas known to have had high temperature anomalies (scores of degree heating
weeks > 8), based on satellite sea surface temperature data provided by NOAA
Coral Reef Watch; and
Observations of severe bleaching from
Reef Base (see ReefBase) .
How to assess the outcome of threats which are real damage and true habitat condition on reefs?
A
unique and important feature of the Reefs at Risk approach
is its global coverage—assessing threats to all reefs, even those far from
human habitation and scientific outreach. It is, however, a model, and it
measures as explained above threat rather than condition.
The only way to accurately assess condition is through direct measurement of
fish, benthic cover (live coral, dead coral, algae, etc.), or other
characteristics. Some reefs, including the Great Barrier Reef, have detailed
and regular surveys covering numerous areas, but worldwide such
observation or monitoring are sparse and irregular.
Some threatened reefs may still be healthy, but many others might have already suffered some level of degradation.
Where are located the most threatened coral regions?
The Figure 3 & 4 below are showing that Southeast Asia (N°1 ranking) and Atlantic Reefs (N°2) regions are relatively the most threatened reef regions in the world; then slightly better: Indian Ocean (N°3) and Middle East (N°4); then Pacific (N°5) less than the averaged global risk; Australia's Great barrier reefs being much less threatened (N°6).
Globally, after factoring by the coral reef regions' area, more than 60% of worldwide coral reefs (about 150,000 km2) are threatened by human local activities (see Figue 3 below) and about 75% (about 185,000 km2) are threatened when past thermal stress is included.
Globally, after factoring by the coral reef regions' area, more than 60% of worldwide coral reefs (about 150,000 km2) are threatened by human local activities (see Figue 3 below) and about 75% (about 185,000 km2) are threatened when past thermal stress is included.
Figure 3 : Integrated local threats consist of the four local threats—overfishing and destructive fishing, marine pollution and damage, coastal development, and watershed-based pollution |
This means that the Southeast Asia is definitely the place where the long-term conservation of coral reefs in the world is at stake, including the survival of many biological species that live there.